So which is it?
Either there are WMD in Iraq and everybody there needs protective clothing, or there aren't and they don't. Which is it? Why are the forces there not wearing protective clothing? It's clear from their disposition that they do not believe there are WMD present. So why does Blair continue to repeat the lie? If it's true after all, then there was criminal negligence in sending the forces in unprotected.
There was 40% too few nerve agent detector units and the MoD's entire stock of 4,000 vapour detection kits, used by troops when they unmask after a suspected chemical attack, was found to be unserviceable.
"Difficulties" in providing enough NBC protection suits in some sizes were found and some gas masks did not fit as well had been thought. - BBC News / National Audit Office Report.
Were they really in such a hurry to comply with His Master's Voice that they were prepared, just as in the 1914-18 war to sacrifice battalions of British youth for nothing - nothing but a craven face-saving exercise for Whitehall time-servers.
Feargal Mooney
1 comment:
__________________________________
Chief UN Inspector Slams Blair
Blix states that Blair's comments are just "innuendo." (Link below.)
Post by : Feargal (host81-128-134-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com / )
__________________________________
Blair's arse is twitching.
Post by : mal castro (webcacheh02a.cache.pol.co.uk / )
__________________________________
You raise a provocative point. I don't see any news reporters/journalists filing their television reports from behind gas masks either. Seeing is believing, they say.
Post by : Piers Plunkett (1cust68.tnt4.ottawa.on.da.uu.net / )
__________________________________
Post a Comment